Rewarding in International Law
نویسندگان
چکیده
Abstract Why states comply with international law has long been at the forefront of and relations scholarship. The compliance discussion largely focused on negative incentives. We argue that there is another, undertheorized mechanism: rewarding. provide a typology illustrations how rewards can be applied. Furthermore, we explore rationale, potential, limitations rewarding, drawing rationalist psychological approaches. Both approaches ample justifications for making greater use rewarding in law.
منابع مشابه
Beyond International Law: Unilateral Resort to Force in Syria
On April 14, 2018, the United States, Britain and France launched missile attacks on specific targets in the Syrian Arab Republic, including the provinces of Damascus and Homs. According to coalition of three states, these attacks were followed by the Syrian government's use of chemical weapons and targeted solely against its chemical weapons facilities. What have in the days after the act been...
متن کاملThe Theoretical Foundations of Jus Cogens in International Law
International Law has it's Constituent elements (legal systems, regimes and collections of rules); Those have interrelations from which legal networks are created. Having this in mind, the question is whether these Constituent elements only have horizental nexus or are ordered by means of factors which unified them in a vertical manner and because of that International Law is named legal orde...
متن کامل"COVID-19" and International Law: Prosecution of China in International Court of Justice
"COVID-19", which was first seen in China in December 2019, outbreak worldwide in a short time and took the lives of many people around the world. In addition to claims concerning Chinachr('39')s fault in creating the disease and failing to prevent its spread, it is seriously claimed that China has delayed and sometimes incorrectly reported information concerning disease to the World Health Org...
متن کاملevasion of law in private international law
it is generally accepted that no one is allowed to abuse his legal rights accorded by a country for evasion from some limitations provided by the same country and several laws and verdicts have considered and confirmed this requirement as a rule. nevertheless there is neither common sense about neither the conditions under which such a rule may be applied nor the reactions to be taken against s...
متن کاملRethinking Jurisdiction in International Law
Jurisdiction has traditionally been considered in international law as purely a question of the rights and powers of states. Conceived in this way, the rules on jurisdiction serve the important function of delimiting (while accepting some overlap of) state regulatory authority – the question of when a person or event may be subject to national regulation – a function which is shared with the co...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: American Journal of International Law
سال: 2021
ISSN: ['2161-7953', '0002-9300']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/ajil.2021.2